home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT2299>
- <title>
- Dec. 27, 1993: The Arts & Media:Books
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Dec. 27, 1993 The New Age of Angels
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE ARTS & MEDIA, Page 82
- Books
- Tremors Of Genderquake
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>A young feminist argues that women should unite to conquer,
- but her attention keeps wandering from the point
- </p>
- <p>By Martha Duffy
- </p>
- <p> For the past decade or so, feminism has been taking a beating.
- Too extreme, according to critics of both sexes. Too splintered.
- Too lesbian. Too blinkered to recognize that most of the important
- goals have already been achieved. In addition, the movement's
- pioneers have distrusted younger feminists, accusing them of
- taking for granted gains that the older generation fought hard
- for.
- </p>
- <p> Two years ago, that internecine friction was challenged by Gloria
- Steinem in Revolution from Within and especially by Susan Faludi
- in Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women. You
- might call Naomi Wolf, whose Fire with Fire (Random House; $21)
- has just been published, a colonist of the territory that Steinem
- and Faludi staked out. Their message was that women were being
- fed cynical lampoons of feminists and not-so-subtle suggestions
- that liberation was responsible for any feelings they had of
- frustration or of "superwoman" tension. Steinem in particular
- countered such propaganda by preaching self-esteem.
- </p>
- <p> Wolf wants women to ignore divisive tendencies within the movement;
- her pitch is, Come one, come all. She advocates something she
- vaguely calls "power feminism," which exploits the fact that
- American women outnumber men and cast 7 million more votes.
- In a section certain to anger most feminists, Wolf even welcomes
- opponents of abortion into the cause. But to many women, control
- of one's body is central to the movement and the right to an
- abortion nonnegotiable.
- </p>
- <p> As a construct, Fire with Fire is flawed. Wolf shifts disconcertingly
- from serious argument to Camille Paglia-like flights of rhetoric--something no one should ever, ever try--to lengthy lists
- of examples to bolster her arguments. In the course of sorting
- through this debris of detail, the reader may well forget the
- original point.
- </p>
- <p> But there are strengths in her work as well. For one thing,
- Wolf is an engaging raconteur. Once at Swarthmore College she
- found herself berated by members of a seminar on women's studies
- as too elitist (she used compound sentences); too lax as an
- academic (she used endnotes instead of footnotes); too much
- of a sellout (she published with a mainstream press). Later,
- over beer and pizza, the same students turned out to be friendly
- and vulnerable, voicing their late-adolescent doubts about sexuality
- and self-esteem.
- </p>
- <p> Wolf is also savvy about the role of TV--especially the Thomas-Hill
- hearings and daytime talk shows--in radicalizing women, including
- homemakers, who are often ignored by political organizers. The
- heroine of her book is Anita Hill, the person most responsible
- for what Wolf calls the "genderquake." Women felt galvanized
- by seeing this tenured law professor who "spoke with the accuracy
- and measured tone of a well-trained attorney, and did not play
- the victim, weep or rely on recounting the destruction of her
- life to make her case." Typically, the author does not develop
- her thoughts about Hill's impact. Instead we get a list of 26
- specific "changes" wrought by the hearings, followed by 30 more
- general citations of their cultural impact, and finally an unfocused
- roundup of global repercussions that includes the election of
- Ireland's President, Mary Robinson. Enough already. In fact,
- far too much.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-